Manor (formerly Marussia)

Virgin

FIA Entry: Marussia Virgin Racing
Car 24: Timo Glock
Car 25: Jerome d’Ambrosio
Engine: Cosworth V8
Team Principal: John Booth
Technical Director: Nick Wirth
Race Engineer Car 24: Mark Hutchison
Race Engineer Car 25: Dave Greenwood

Stats as of end 2010

First Entered 2010
Races Entered 19
Race Wins 0
Pole Positions 0
Fastest Laps 0
Driver World Championships 0
Constructor World Championships 0

Manor Motorsport

When F3 team Manor Motorsport were given a place on the F1 grid in 2010 they commissioned Wirth Research to build them a car. Brawn sponsor Virgin became title sponsor and Virgin Racing was born

Virgin Racing

With Cosworth engines, Xtrac gearboxes and drivers Timo Glock and Lucas di Grassi Virgin Racing embarked on their first F1 season. The VR01 chassis was the first ever F1 designed entirely using CFD, with designer Nick Wirth believing computer simulations were sufficient to not need expensive wind tunnel testing.

Inevitably the team had reliability issues early on and they also discovered the fuel tank on the car wasn't sufficiently large enough to allow the team to complete full race distance. Wirth Research got a dispensation from the FIA to homologate a new chassis and by Spain both cars finished the race.

The team regularly finished races but barely troubled the mid-field. By seasons end the team were placed 12th and last in the Constructors Championship based on a count back of minor placing’s having managed a highest finish of 14th.

2011

Russian carmaker Marussia have taken a controlling interest in the team for 2011 and Belgian Jerome d’Ambrosio replaces Lucas di Grassi. With the VR02 chassis Virgin will be hoping to move further up the grid in 2011.
 
F1 | Manor's revelations

So it seems from the insiders that Manor would prob have been hanging on to the coattails of the midfield pack and been fairly competitive.

Once again shows the lack of foresight of those running F1. Just a little bit more pay out and financial parachutes and we'd have had another competitive team on the grid which can only be good for the sport.

I'd say the sport would learn it's lesson but seeing as the exact same thing happened to the exact same team in 2015 as well I'm guessing it won't.
 
Hindsight is a wonderful thing but then again when the big 5 teams monopolise the income distribution then what is the point of the other teams turning up? they might as well let those 5 teams compete for F1 and see how quickly people will be turned off by the lack of spectacle and operating essentially a monopoly
 
Last edited:
Sorry Manor but with the auction of your remaining assets a few weeks away, the 'current' tag has to go.
 
Back
Top Bottom