Schumacher criticises Pirelli tyres

Yeah but after 3 dray races the winner was the first driver leading the race at the first lap... Not really a lottery!

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Because he has a clear track and able to perserve the tyres, while the rest squabble over each other making their tyres drop off?

Maybe, but this year the leader is more challenged than last year or even before...

I don't like the tyres, I think they are too big a factor. The drivers still have to drive to the engine, brakes, gearbox in addition to good old fashioned racing.

When the track is so covered with such large lumps of tyre debris, I think calling them "marbles" these days is pushing it, before the first round of pit stops then you are also managing a degrading track.

The idea for Pirelli was good, but when designing a car the teams gain a second a lap 1/10th at a time. The FIA seem to have decided to cut corners on the effort.

I actually am coming round to DRS, but mainly because it doesn't seem to be causing many overtakes between competitive cars, I can agree with KERS as it is a limited resource driver tool available to all, but I think the FIA has got 2/10ths of the problem with those. They seem to be shooting for 8/10ths with the tyres and it's too big an ask.

Brundle said that Bahrain, Abu Dhabi and Singapore all use stone imported from Shropshire in the track surface.

Are not people forgetting the teams had this problem last year and they decided to keep the rules when everyone was saving tyres for races from quali

Now so far we've seen Toro Rosso's and Sauber s get points from starting low down in 2011

The nearest anyone has got to winning for being knocked out in Q1 not due to weather was Webber last year in CHina

If one of the top teams starts winning starts winning more often from the back there will be uproar to change the rules

Schumacher say's he cant push but tyre management has always been part of F1 so it is nothing new except Pirelli have been told not to make tyres like Bridgestones which were able to do 100 laps if there was no mandatory change to other sets rule in dry conditions

i remember BRidgestones in Melbourne 2009 fell away by 5 laps and lost about 2 seconds per lap and by the end of 2010 they lasted the wole race...Vettel benefitted in MOnza doing a last lap pitstop and we kept having Saubers trying to do 60 laps on one set

Prost would have loved these regulations ... the people who are complaining are those who are losing the most ..yes Schumacher with custom made Bridgestones in his hey day

First of all there are several drivers complaining, and they are not losing out the most.

Is Schumacher losing the most from this situation? No.

Schumacher's had 4 races out of 4 where something has ruined his race, and it's not been tyres.
Australia mechanical failure.
Malaysia punted off by Grosjean.
China wheel wasn't fitted properly.
Bahrain DRS failed in qualifying knocking him out.

People are quick to point out that Schumacher is moaning because he is losing out a lot with these tyres this season, if he didn't have all those problems in those races, he would certainly be in the top 5 in the championship, as the only top driver to have had problems through no fault of his own this season effecting his race results massively. (Yeah, I know, that's motor racing for you).

(Hope I don't get pulled up for this by the moderators, but I felt as if I should quote this certain bit.)

Slyboogy he should have more fresher tyres than everyone else in front ... I am sure if he was up to 5th like Spa last year he would be saying what a fun race he had

Like I said the teams had a chance last year to change the rules even though they saw drivers and teams were deliberately saving sets but they all said lets keep it that way

So they all only have themselves to blame or the drivers should complain to their bosses not Pirelli


The only race last year I got annoyed with Pirelli was Monaco when Vettel won lasting s48 laps on old tyres before the flag came out...even Pirelli realised that tyres should not be changed on restart

Speshal so which 10-20% are happy about the current regulations...probably those at the front who can deal with it better

All Pirelli can do is make tyres last a bit longer say 25 to 30 laps but not the whole race

the only criticism of Pirelli is the cliff bit when suddenly a driver has no grip rather than slow degradation

I don;t remember any other tyre company petition for the sole tyre deal after Bridgestone said they were leaving

Force India maybe?

They are the ones who seem to deploy this tactic time and after time.

Slyboogy not as bad as Sauber who always try and last the race being mobile chicanes when they can

Force Inda , Sauber mainly but I am sure people will say something different if they both won more races that way

I wasn't aware the teams were able to change the rules, thought that was the FIA?

18th better than 17th though? Just don't qualify 19th

jez101 18th and 17th are usually populated by midfield cars, and will be very similar except 18th has an extra set of softs. For 19th, that almost always features a new team.

One of the biggest changes Pirelli made this year is that the shoulders of the tyres are much squarer than before. The effects
the fronts more than the rears, making the handling change more pronounced and contributing greatly to the "marbles" off-line.

Is it just me or do the tires have a narrower operating window than last year.