Grand Prix 2019 French Grand Prix Practice, Qualifying & Race Discussion

Discussion in 'Formula One Discussion' started by cider_and_toast, Jun 19, 2019.

  1. RasputinLives

    RasputinLives Not dead Contributor

    Featured Threads:
    63
    Interestingly, in the first race of the F3 this weekend a driver was given a 5 second time penalty for gaining an advantage, but then 7 laps later the stewards withdrew it! Never seen that happen before ever.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to remove all adverts.
  3. Ruslan

    Ruslan Points Scorer

    Well, FIA probably needs to gather together with of bunch of experienced stewards and driver-stewards and have a extended multi-day conference that reviews all the incidents in the last 5 or so years and how they were ruled on then and why...and then come up with a set of written guidelines for racing in the future. They clearly need consistency but they also need a set of rules/guidelines as to what they will penalized and what they will not. I also don't think they actually need to re-write the rules, but they do need some guidelines because right now, the approach appears to be penalize everything.

    This might also be a good time to switch to paid professional stewards (because right now, I gather it is an un-paid volunteer position).
     
  4. Ruslan

    Ruslan Points Scorer

    They clearly don't know what they are supposed to do. Tough job adjudicating the rules when you are not sure what they are.
     
  5. Il_leone

    Il_leone Champion Elect

    Featured Threads:
    3
    RasputinLives Maybe but Prost was pushed over the edge at Mclaren that forced him to go to Ferrari and when he was fed up of the politics at Ferrari and not being able to compete with Mclaren and Senna .. he promptly got fired for speaking out

    Certainly between 1990 and 1991 Senna was winning every battle on track and off track...
     
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2019
  6. RasputinLives

    RasputinLives Not dead Contributor

    Featured Threads:
    63
    I suggest you go back and watch 1990 again. Prost was mighty in the middle part of the year in a car which was not as good as what Senna had under him. He put so much pressure on him that Senna chose to end the championship in the way he did.

    As for 91 - nothing to do with Senna - the Ferrari was crap.
     
    Andyoak and rufus_mcdufus like this.
  7. gethinceri

    gethinceri Daniil Kvyat Fan. Alfa Romeo Fan. Contributor

    Featured Threads:
    2
    I think both of Ricciardo's penalties are justified, the first because he had left the track and then rejoined in such a manner as to impede his opponent and the second because he voluntarily left the track in order to overtake, his opponent had closed the door.
     
    F1Brits_90 likes this.
  8. F1Brits_90

    F1Brits_90 Race Winner

    Featured Threads:
    6
    I thought id heard senna always said the 1990 incident was his way of getting revenge/justice for 1989. as he had never forgot, almost obsessed over it for the next yr which I glad he did because murray's "its happened immediately" is 1 of the best F1 commentary lines

    I don't get why people are arguing this because its nothing like vettel. riccardio outbraked himself was in full control of his & then went all 4 wheels off the track to overtake both Norris & Kimi. it was slam dunk gaining an advatange
     
  9. Il_leone

    Il_leone Champion Elect

    Featured Threads:
    3
    RasputinLives Yes Ferrari in 1991 was crap but Prost made this own bed by choosing to leave Mclaren because he could not take fighting with Senna in the same team. The Mclaren in 1991 was I thought just a bit marginally better as a car but Senna somehow managed to drag it over the line when it had no right to. The sort of thing that Prost use to do in a Mclaren and it was getting to Alain - the team he knows so well was getting the results and he was not at Ferrari and he was losing every battle with Senna on the track. The only thing Prost did do right for his own sake was to block Senna from joining Williams so he could have a free title

    Back to 1990 it was a great championship but it was seemed to me that Senna was always a touch ahead in the title race and what came down to Suzuka is open to opinion whether Balestre rightly or wrongly interfered with the pole position starting point argument
     
  10. cider_and_toast

    cider_and_toast Exulted Lord High Moderator of the Apex Staff Member Premium Contributor

    Featured Threads:
    34
    Regardless of the fact that Prost was leaving McLaren the sight of Ron Dennis trying to get Senna's win reinstated at Japan in 89 thus denying Prost the Championship (at least carrying the fight on into Australia) must have seriously hurt.

    Prost had delivered Dennis and McLaren 2 titles and was just about to clinch a third for himself and the team.

    Prost should have walked away with his title and gave Dennis the middle finger after Japan.
     
  11. Il_leone

    Il_leone Champion Elect

    Featured Threads:
    3
    cider_and_toast Maybe but Prost announced he was leaving at the French Grand Prix and you should see Ron's glum face next to him in the press conference

    To add further fuel to the fire Prost throw his winners trophy to the Tifosi at the Italian Grand Prix after Senna spun out of the lead handing him the win and after he announced he was joining Ferrari much to Ron's disgust. It is said this was the reason Mclaren keep all the winners trophy.

    Prost did say it was his worst season in F1 - he could not face Senna going to extreme lengths and intensity to beat him
     

Share This

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use it, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice