Grand Prix 2015 Canadian Grand Prix Practice, Qualifying & Race Discussion

In 1976 Montreal hosted the Summer Olympic games. This in itself is not that interesting a fact but what is interesting is that it is estimated that the Olympic stadium cost the city of Montreal somewhere in the region of 1.6 billion Canadian Dollars by the time the bill was fully paid in 2006. What does this have to do with F1? Well apart from the obvious, that the Circuit Ile Notre-Dame, as it was originally known, or the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve as it became known, is partly built around the 1976 Olympic Rowing lake, there is a wider reason to celebrate the GP. In the wake of the Olympics the city almost bankrupted itself. Such was the dodgy state of the finances after the Canadian government insisted that the full costs were met by the City, that anything that wasn’t nailed down was auctioned off. What this highlights is that while on the surface, it would seem to be the greatest show on earth, under the surface the shear effort required to project that image can do lasting damage. Surely an analogy for F1 if ever there was one.

This is why we must celebrate Canada and the Canadian GP. From the moment that Gilles Villeneuve won the first race held in Montreal in 1978 the circuit has proven time and time again what an asset it is to the F1 calendar. There are any number of great moments that spring to mind from Button harrying Vettel into a last lap mistake to take an unlikely win, to the hilarity of Nelson Piquet winning for Benetton in 91 after Mansell had caused his own engine to cut out when he’d been leading by a mile and slowed down to wave to the crowd. There are even small events such as Takuma Sato in his Super Aguri chasing down and eventually passing Fernando Alonso to finish in 6th place. A move that gained him the award for ‘Overtake of the year’ showing that F1 fans have a sense of humour even in F1 doesn’t.

The circuit itself remains refreshingly unchanged from its first race in 78. There have been minor changes to kerbs and a pit lane extension to cope with NASCAR grids but apart from that little else. Back in the mid-90’s before Bernie outlawed the teams having fun unless they paid a ‘fun premium’, the mechanics would hold a raft race across the Olympic rowing lake, on the Thursday before the race. From my old and dusty Jordan F1 team supporters club letters, it would seem Jordan picked up the winners trophy in this race several years before Damon Hill picked up their first trophy on track. It could be argued though that Hill was possibly only slighter drier than the Jordan raft building crew.

That’s the sort of atmosphere that surrounds the race though. It’s tough, it’s unpredictable and it’s hugely enjoyable. For those who like a drink with their F1, there are more than enough ‘drinking game opportunities to be had including every time the ‘wall of champions’ gets a mention or stories surrounding Alesi’s first win or the Olympics. The race will be live on both Sky and the BBC again proving how popular it is.

As for the current grid, coming off the back of Monaco, this is the shot in the arm that the sport needs. Hamilton will be odds on favourite to add to his three victories at a circuit where he took his first win and one that he clearly enjoys. Proving how difficult it is to succeed here, only a handful of drivers have won this race more than once although Michael Schumacher does account for a staggering 8 wins at this track.

Let’s hope that Canada doesn’t let us down because it rarely does.
 
Last edited:
Brogan - It only applies to the component penalties, rather than the sporting penalties.

Which, naturally, does not make any kind of sense considering that the red flag penalty is surely more serious - particularly in light of Suzuka.

I also don't understand why the penalty took until after qualifying; Schumacher's comparable penalty at Budapest in 2006 was confirmed after FP3. Have the stewards started to have a longer lunch?
 
Looks like Button is taking a penalty for using a new MGU-H and turbo - I think he's now on his 5th of each. Looks like he has to serve a drive-through penalty during the race.
 
In the latest news on McLaren it has been reported that they have finally got an answer from Honda as to their engine teething problems.

It reads.

我々はクソ手掛かりメイトを持っていません

And is pronounced.

Wareware wa kuso tegakari meito o motte imasen

It has been reported to translate into English to mean.

"We haven't got a ****ing clue mate."
 
Last edited:
I love the irony of Renault & Honda supposed 'reliability' both used tokens for that purpose in 2015 Renault preseason & honda this week & neither can finish gp without an engine blow up. Riccardio has a new engine every weekend button new engine barely made it to Fp3
 
Exactly. And what does "reliability upgrade" even mean? And what do they actually do?

This is why I and a few others by the look of it have given up trying to understand the token system. How do diferentiate between a power upgrade, a reliability upgrade or an anything upgrade without one directly influencing the other? An engine's an engine. If you improve its reliability its components and accessories are under less pressure and you improve its power because for one thing you can push it higher for longer. You also improve its fuel consumption because everything that runs smoother consumes less energy, and so on.

How can you separate those into distinct factors? When they they reliability upgrades, do any of us have any idea what is it they're actually doing?
 
I think the others will be wondering how Mercedes could possibly need a reliability upgrade considering they've not had an engine failure in 48 attempts this year.
 
It was reported by the various journos on Twitter as a drive through but Verstappen has a stop go so who knows.
 
A bit like giving a man with no money a new credit card but a higher interest rate!!
 
Last edited:
Confirmed as a drive through for Button: http://www.fia.com/file/29070/download?token=X_iTFagj

upload_2015-6-7_18-1-34.png
 
Back
Top Bottom